Is my writing good or is it shit? I wrestle with this daily—trying to decide whether what I write falls into one or the other, as if those are real categories, or just shorthand for how I feel about myself on a given day. A paragraph feels honest in the morning, an embarrassing hangover memory by nightfall. Nothing changed except me.
This should probably tell me something.
I’m not even sure who I’m writing this for. I created this blog, technically, a paid-for service, but it might as well be a notebook with Wi-Fi. A single, anonymous blog among hundreds of thousands, existing silently, mostly unread. Invisible in the way most things are invisible. If I write and no one reads it, does it exist?
I don’t know why I do this. I don’t know why I keep coming back to the page to face the ambivalence of the blinking cursor when I’m fairly certain it doesn’t matter.
Perhaps this is just for me. Or maybe it’s for a future version of me who has forgotten how this felt and needs proof. Or maybe it’s for you—someone I’ll never meet, who years from now accidentally stumbles upon this and recognizes the shape of the problem.
“I think I use writing the way some people use thinking out loud—less performance, more self-location. A way to find out where I actually stand.”
I only know that asking “Is this good?” has never helped me start or finish.
Writing is difficult. Not technically—no one stops me from forming sentences—but difficult in the way digging is difficult. Sweat-inducing, callous building, pain expected. I rarely begin with ideas so much as vague pressures, fragments of memory. A sense that something is there, lurking under the surface, but not yet nameable.
The work is locating it. The difficulty is pinning it down, forcing it to acquiesce without killing it. Most days, this feels like too much effort for something no one asked for. An invention in search of an unmet need.
There are also things I can’t write. Not because they’re untrue, but because someone I love might read them. Because someone I love might find pain in words where none was meant. This doesn’t make the writing dishonest. It binds it. But all writing is bound. All writing has edges. Silence is part of its shape.
The idea of “good writing” floats above all this like a judging specter.
Cleared.
Polished.
Finished.
Attention-worthy.
But I don’t think that’s what I’m doing here. I think I use writing the way some people use thinking out loud—less performance, more self-location. A way to find out where I actually stand.
I was here. A textual Kilroy.
Maybe that’s the myth: that writing’s only responsibility is to prove something. To justify itself. To count only if it lands somewhere visible. What I keep discovering, reluctantly, is that writing can be useful even when it feels pointless—especially when the only thing it accomplishes is making the next sentence possible.
This writing is not shit.
It’s also not good. At least not as the myth would frame it.
But it is alive. A rarer and much more difficult thing to fake.